Figure Legend In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 8. Values for C1 and C2 were inverted. The correct legend appears below. Figure 8 legend becomes: Clustering analysis from Inception V3 deep learning features based on combined superficial and deep OCT-As. The mean 1-year BVCA for C1 and C2 was 66.67 and 49.1, respectively, with a t-test p-value equal to 0.005. Text Correction There was an error in the original publication. Values for C1 and C2 were inverted. A correction has been made to Abstract, sentence: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) C1 = 49.10 (18.60 SD) and BCVA C2 = 66.67 (16.00 SD, p = 0.005) The sentence becomes: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) C1 = 66.67 (16.00 SD) and BCVA C2 = 49.10 (18.60 SD, p = 0.005). A correction has been made to Results, Paragraph 9, sentence: In this configuration, the mean of letters for C1 and C2 was 49.1 and 66.67, respectively, with a t-test p-value equal to 0.005 (Figure 8) The sentence becomes: In this configuration, the mean of letters for C1 and C2 was 66.67 and 49.1, respectively, with a t-test p-value equal to 0.005 (Figure 8). Error in Table In the original publication, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. Values for C1 and C2 were inverted. The corrected Table 2 appears below.
Correction: Rizzo et al. Artificial Intelligence and OCT Angiography in Full Thickness Macular Hole. New Developments for Personalized Medicine. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2319
Savastano A.;
2022-01-01
Abstract
Figure Legend In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 8. Values for C1 and C2 were inverted. The correct legend appears below. Figure 8 legend becomes: Clustering analysis from Inception V3 deep learning features based on combined superficial and deep OCT-As. The mean 1-year BVCA for C1 and C2 was 66.67 and 49.1, respectively, with a t-test p-value equal to 0.005. Text Correction There was an error in the original publication. Values for C1 and C2 were inverted. A correction has been made to Abstract, sentence: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) C1 = 49.10 (18.60 SD) and BCVA C2 = 66.67 (16.00 SD, p = 0.005) The sentence becomes: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) C1 = 66.67 (16.00 SD) and BCVA C2 = 49.10 (18.60 SD, p = 0.005). A correction has been made to Results, Paragraph 9, sentence: In this configuration, the mean of letters for C1 and C2 was 49.1 and 66.67, respectively, with a t-test p-value equal to 0.005 (Figure 8) The sentence becomes: In this configuration, the mean of letters for C1 and C2 was 66.67 and 49.1, respectively, with a t-test p-value equal to 0.005 (Figure 8). Error in Table In the original publication, there was a mistake in Table 2 as published. Values for C1 and C2 were inverted. The corrected Table 2 appears below.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.