A political falling out arose at the time of the Franco-Prussian War between two of the most prominent ancient historians of the nineteenth century, Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges and Theodor Mommsen. Retracing the details of the episode allows a better appreciation of what was, in historical and political terms, a very tense affair. But the engagement of these two scholars in this matter allows us to grasp, beyond their patriotic motives, how profound a difference lay between them, on the historiographical and methodological level, in their approach to the history of Rome and to the very idea of the «State».

La penna e la spada. Fustel de Coulanges vs Mommsen, una pagina dimenticata

RANDAZZO, SALVATORE
2015-01-01

Abstract

A political falling out arose at the time of the Franco-Prussian War between two of the most prominent ancient historians of the nineteenth century, Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges and Theodor Mommsen. Retracing the details of the episode allows a better appreciation of what was, in historical and political terms, a very tense affair. But the engagement of these two scholars in this matter allows us to grasp, beyond their patriotic motives, how profound a difference lay between them, on the historiographical and methodological level, in their approach to the history of Rome and to the very idea of the «State».
2015
Fustel; Mommsen; State
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12572/939
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact